Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Carey Price’

Want to Fix the NHL? Start Here.

July 20th, 2010 Kyle 9 comments
Every year, the league’s General Managers get together and discuss some hot-button issues in their sport and try to find ways to improve hockey and make it safer for their pricey investments on the ice. Usually, nothing gets done, but at least they talk about it.
 
But I’m writing today to talk about a deep-rooted problem in the league, and it needs to be stopped, immediately. It’s ruining the game; rotting it from the inside so quietly like a disease that progresses without symptoms until it’s beyond curable. It’s not too late to cure the NHL of this affliction, but something has to be done right away. It can’t wait any longer.
 
It’s not headshots. We’ve all spoken enough about that ad nauseum. It’s not oversized goalie equipment or the stupid delay of game penalty.
 
So what is it?
 
Lame, bland, thoughtless, banal nicknames.
 
Remember the great nicknames? The Rocket, Mr. Hockey, Boom-Boom, The Golden Jet (and Brett), The Dominator, The Hammer, Knuckes, St. Patrick. Stars who were instantly identifiable by a moniker that sometimes wasn’t just a silly truncating of the player’s name. The list is virtually endless, and although this illness isn’t exactly a new millennium thing, it’s progressing rapidly. The will to find a decent name for someone is nearly dead. 20 years ago we were treated to “The Great One vs Super Mario”. Today we get “Sid the Kid vs Alex the Great” (didn’t Alex Mogilny have that nickname first? Oh, wait. It’s Alex the Gr8″. How stupid of me. That makes it all better. And what happens when Sid is 28? He won’t be much more of a kid, will he?)
 
Here’s a quote from Mike Babcock from earlier this year, which appeared in Red Fisher’s “The Red Line” column:
“I thought ‘Fil’ and Bertuzzi together were really good for us, really got going. And then, obviously ‘Pav’ and ‘Homer’ and ‘Mule’ have been excellent for us, and I thought ‘Z’ and ‘Clears’ chipped in as well. That was good. ‘Helmer’s’ group had a real good night, and that’s what you need, you need everyone on deck.”
 Let’s review the quote: ‘Fil’ is Valterri Filppula. We all know who Bertuzzi is (though I have to admit that I’m shocked he didn’t abbreviate to ‘Bert’). Thinking out of the box like any good McGill grad, Babcock then makes the innovative leap of shortening Datsyuk’s first name, Pavel, to ‘Pav’. Genius! ‘Homer’ is Tomas Holmstrom, and in what is perhaps the only legitimate nickname in the bunch, ‘Mule’ is Johan Franzen. Lastly, in a clear display of waving the white flag, Babcock refers to Dan Cleary as ‘Clears’ and Darren Helm as ‘Helmer’.
 
I don’t know about you, but that hurt me like a kick to the teeth.
 
Has it really come to this? Is shortening a guy’s name to some cutesy pronunciation the best that can be done?
 
Take a glimpse at the Habs; they’re no better than anyone else:
 
Scott Gomez: Gomer
Brian Gionta: Gio (some call him Giant, but to me that’s as clever as calling your chihuahua “Killer”)
Michael Cammalleri: Cammy
Carey Price: Pricey (formerly known as Jesus Price. Maybe the fans will give that one back)
Andrei Markov: Marky
Roman Hamrlik: Hamr (this one out of sheer coincidence more than anything. Just lop off the last 3 letters and you get a pretty cool name that in no way describes the way Hamrlik plays) 
Tomas Plekanec: Pleks or Pleky, as he is known to fans. (Forgiveable since economizing words on twitter is key!)
 
Just a few months ago, Glen Metropolit was “Metro”, Matt D’Agostini was “Dags” (don’t be offended Pierre Dagenais), and Max Pacioretty was “MaxPac”.
 
You get the idea, and it’s not a pretty picture. It’s not new, either, and surely not every era of hockey was immune to this. Steve Shutt was “Shutty”. I’ll risk a public flogging for this one, but what does “The Flower” have to do with hockey? How does it decribe anything other than a direct translation of his surname? Would he have been named The Flower if his name was Laporte? Certainly not, so what does “The Flower” have to do with hockey? If you mention anything about blooming, I’ll kill you. More recently, Saku Koivu was “Sak” (though some called him Captain K), Sheldon Souray was “Shelly”, Craig Rivet was “Rivs”, and was probably confused often with former teammate Mike Ribeiro’s “Ribs” (this one was almost clever. They gave him the mandatory name shrinkage, but because he’s so skinny, his ribs were quite visible.) Laughably, Francis Bouillon was “Frankie Boo”, and today Benoit Pouliot is known to fans as “Benny Pou”. Elsewhere, Jarome Iginla is “Iggy”, Brent Seabrook is “Seabs”, Patrick Kane is “Kaner”, Marc Savard is “Savvy”, Milan Lucic is “Looch” (perhaps after the Loochness Monster?) and Patrice Bergeron is “Bergy”. My head hurts from pounding it against the wall in despair.
 
But wait. There’s more!
 
When I say “Kovy”, who do you think of? Habs fans will stand up and say that there’s only one Kovy and his name is Alex Kovalev. The rest of the NHL’s fans will likely stand up and say that Ilya Kovalchuk is the real Kovy. Either way, it’s a shitty nickname. Doubling it just makes it even more stupid and puts this whole silly gongshow on display for all to see. And you thought the CFL having 2 Roughrider teams was dumb! In part 2 of this exercise, when I say “Lappy”, who do you think of? Habs fans talk about young forward Maxim Lapierre, who, given his penchant for running his mouth ought to be renamed Yappy, but that’s another story. The rest of the league, and specifically Flyers fans will tell you that “Lappy” belongs to Ian Laperrière. And really, doesn’t a blood-and-guts guy like Laperrière deserve better than “Lappy”? Makes me think of a dog slurping water.
 
Is it a totally bleak picture? No. Are there any good names out there? Sure there are. Jordin Tootoo, known for his reckless style of play has one of the leagues better nicknames, if not an entirely predictable one: The Tootoo Train. Sometimes the gods smile upon you. Rangers Pugilist Derek Boogaard has a fitting nickname in the “Boogeyman” but for every Tootoo Train or Boogeyman, there’s 10 “Staalsys” (as they call at least one of the Staal brothers) or “Saks” or “Bergys”. What’s causing this? Is it a simple lack of willingness or creativity or is it a deeper thing where because the NHL is so multicultural these days, things simply get lost in translation and it’s just easier to shorten a guy’s name? Maybe it’s because players move around so much that they don’t get time to endear themselves to players like they did in the past when they would spend years and years together.
 
I don’t have the answer, but I believe every time a player publicly abbreviates a teammate’s name, he should be fined by the league in the amount of $10,000, on a per-name basis. So if Cammalleri said something like “well I just set up on the off-wing, Gomer found me with a nice cross-ice pass and I slid it back to Marky at the point who put a good shot on net, and it’s lucky for us that Gio was there to tip it in”, he’d be out $30k. They can continue to call each other their cute half-names on the ice because I’m sure some will say that in the course of the action, it’s critical to communicate quickly, so I won’t begrudge the players that.
 
As for us fans, we’re tougher to moderate. Even I’m guilty of using these insipid nicknames. But make no mistake, it’s a very contagious and dangerous disease. Please protect yourself.
 
Now it’s your turn. Shine the light on some of the more brutal “nicknames” out there, and let’s see if we can’t get better alternatives off the ground.
 
Good God…is it October yet?

Halak Trade Blog Roundup

June 18th, 2010 Kyle No comments

As a Habs fan with a blog, I thought it would be almost compulsory to write yet another blog about the Halak trade, but I’m not going to do that. There are a lot of blogs already out there that already sum up what I feel (in summary: inevitable, necessary, smart).

Instead of adding to the chatter, I want to post a roundup of some of the Halak blogs written in the past couple days:

All Habs: Halak Fans Singing the Blues

The Active Stick: The Halak trade may not actually be the end of the world

The Daily Hab-It: Everyone Breathe Deeply and For What It’s Worth

Schmitzy Says: I’m back. You might not like me though. But I don’t super dig many of you right now either. So sue me.

Habs Loyalist: Obituaries

The Checking Line: BREAKING NEWS: Jaroslav Halak Traded to St. Louis Blues

Eric Engels at HockeyBuzz: Gauthier Trades Halak to Blues. Commits to Price and Salary Space.

That ought to fill your cup many times over, if you haven’t read enough already. These are all worth reading for their own merits and the whole spectrum of opinion is represented here. If I forgot any blogs, please let me know and I’ll add them to the list.

Enjoy!

P.S. Be sure to check out my blog post that I wrote Wednesday before the Halak deal went down, advocating Pierre Gauthier’s need to make bold moves.

Has the Tide in the Halak vs Price Debate Turned?

January 25th, 2010 Kyle 13 comments

Last month, the boys over at Habseyesontheprize.com posted a brilliant breakdown of the stats between Carey Price and Jaroslav Halak. It’s too long and in-depth to even tell you about the conclusions, and besides, it’s so well done that it deserves to be read on its own. Take the 10 minutes to check it out, it’s worth it.

I wanted to provide a little update on the stats today, though I am certainly not going to get in to as much depth as they did. This is the quick & dirty edition. I’m also going to go as far back as December 19th, the day that Andrei Markov rejoined the team. That was the date that Habs fans pointed to as the game to which we will see the real Canadiens stand up and show themselves. Since then, Jaroslav Halak has started 11 games, and Price has started just 6.

Before I start with the details, I want to make it known that I don’t care who starts for the Canadiens, so long as each gets their fair chance. I also want it to be known that I don’t care which one is traded, so long as the Canadiens are a better team AFTER the deal than before it, and for many years thereafter. Also for the record: I reject the argument that you can’t trade the 5th overall draft choice. We just acquired the 4th pick in the same draft year as Price in Benoit Pouliot, so let’s not say that these types of selections can’t be moved.

Here are their stats since December 19th, the day Andrei Markov returned:

Price (6 starts) Halak (11 starts)
Record 2-3-1 8-2-1
Save percentage .918 .943
Save percentage in wins .944 .967
Save percentage in losses .905 .880
Average goals for in wins 3.5 3.9
Average goals for in losses 1.8 1.6
Average shots against per game 33.2 37.5

So what do we make of these numbers? Do we want to start looking at quality of opponent. We could, but I think that’s becoming a lame-duck argument. In the East, there are really only 4 good teams: the Sabres, Devils, Penguins and Capitals. Everyone else is very up-and-down, and not much better than any other team among the other 13 teams. But just for fun, let’s take a look. Price played the Capitals and Sabres in his last 6 games, and because the team in front of him is not that good, he lost both, including a 1-0 loss to the Sabres in which Price was terrific, posting a .971 save percentage. If one goalie in the league was going to be better that night, it had to be Ryan Miller, who, in my opinion is the hands down Vézina Trophy winner at this point. On the flip side, Halak played the Devils twice, who are notorious for beating the Canadiens each and every time. In fact, the Canadiens just won a Friday game in New Jersey for the first time since 1989. Martin Brodeur simply owns the Canadiens. That said, Halak went 1-0-1 vs the Devils, posting a .969 save percentage in the win, and a .929 save percentage in a 2-1 overtime loss. Halak took 3 pts, while Price took none. Easy to say that Halak wins this battle, and if you’re the type that is all about points, no matter how they come, then Halak is your guy. I’ll give Halak the slight edge, because the end result DOES matter, but Price did everything he could to give the Canadiens a chance to beat the Sabres at home.

The numbers are good across the board for both goaltenders. Both face a lot of rubber, and both are very efficient at stopping the puck.  Price seems to be steadier overall, with less fluctuation in his save percentages. Halak, meanwhile, seems to be very very good (and has been perfect in 3 instances in the past month) in wins, and is not very good in losses. The similarities are striking. Halak’s save percentage is .23 higher than Price’s when the Canadiens win, while his save percentage in losses is .25 lower. Again, it says that when Halak is good, he’s nearly unbeatable. When he’s bad, the Canadiens are almost guaranteed to lose.

So where does this leave us? At this point it comes down to intangibles. Many of which we are not privy to. How do the rest of the Canadiens view their 2 young goaltenders, behind closed doors…beyond the clichés? What is their body language like on the ice after they surrender a goal? Is one more likely than the other to give up a bad goal? Lately, I believe Price has given up more weak, demoralizing goals than has Halak, and does not seem to have the same level of 60-minute focus as Halak. That is totally subject to interpretation and personal opinion/bias. Halak’s rebound control is not as sharp as Price’s (though Price’s has not been so hot lately either; the goalie coach is not helping either improve in this area). It’s an adventure when either leave their crease.

As the Canadiens struggle to stay in the playoff race, they have no choice but to go with the goalie that is delivering wins on a more consistent basis. Right now that guy is Halak. Today being the Monday after a good weekend for the Canadiens, and Halak in particular, I was not surprised to see Montreal Gazette veterans Dave Stubbs and Jack Todd throw their support behind Halak for the #1 job. TSN’s Bob McKenzie is a regular guest on the Team 990 and also said that he believes that Jacques Martin has no choice but to let Halak run with the #1 job until he blows it. And no, a loss does not mean he’s blown it. It is at the same time fascinating and sad that in 79 career games with the Canadiens, Jaroslav Halak has NEVER been allowed to start the next game following a loss. Never. How can a team properly evaluate what a goaltender’s mental constitution is if they do not allow him the opportunity to bounce back from a loss? Many feel that Halak was robbed of the chance to get the Canadiens in to the playoffs 2 seasons ago in the last game of the season vs the Leafs. Halak had carried the ball for the injured the Cristobal Huet, but former coach Guy Carbonneau decided to go with Huet when he was ready to go for that last game. Huet folded like a cheap tent, and the Canadiens were eliminated, blowing a big 3rd period lead. Last season, many will say that Halak’s performances are what got the Canadiens in to the playoffs last season, and was again denied the chance to play. The Canadiens were swept by the Bruins, and I don’t think Halak would have done anything to prevent that. Gainey decided to let Price play, in order to let him gain more experience in meaningful games. I’m not sure how much experience was gained in those 4 embarassing losses.

This season is a different story, however. Both Price and Halak are restricted free agents, and both deserve to prove what they’re made of. Halak has been repeatedly put in to a corner, and essentially told that he’s not allowed to screw up. And for the most part, he hasn’t. When he loses, Carey Price gets the next start, and, presumably, the chance to retake the #1 job. He has not done that, despite being very good in 3 of his last 6 starts. I guess that what I’m saying is that it is time to let Halak show what he can do. The Canadiens would only be doing themselves a disservice by not getting the full picture. They’d also be cheating themselves if Halak can further raise his trade value from where it is. Or maybe they do an about-face and decide that they want to keep Halak and move Price for a King’s ransom.

This does not mean that I think Price is the obvious choice to be sent out of town. Ditto for Halak. Gainey has a very tough choice on to make, and, frankly, one that 29 other General Managers would kill to have the privilege of making. It’s still unlikely to me that Gainey will part ways with Price given how much he has supported him, but he did also say that Guy Carbonneau was the best move he had ever made, only to fire him a couple months later. Gainey has to weigh the relative performance of each goalie vs what they’ll probably be making next season vs what either asset can bring back to the team. If he’s approaching this with an open mind, and if he finds that moving Price makes most sense, then that’s what he has to do. His job is to improve the Canadiens, regardless of the names on the back of the jersey, and regardless of what it means to his reputation.

These are decisions I’m glad I don’t have to make. You know, I think we can all agree that Canadiens fans have many other problems to dissect, but goaltending is not one of them. But it is fun to talk about, isn’t it?

UPDATE (1:03 p.m.): Sometimes when you post a blog like this, you hope that you’re not going to get slammed for it. But I’m relieved that Elliotte Friedman of Hockey Night in Canada also now believes that Gainey needs to consider trading Price. Again – consider, not absolutely trade.